Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40687 (CHH)

ANANG PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4440/2025 · 2025-08-17

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:41490 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4440 of 2025 Anang Pratap Singh S/o Raghuvir Pratap Singh Aged About 17 Years R/o Ward No.06 Yadav Para, Banahil, P.O. Pakaria Police Station Mulmula, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Through His Father And Guardian Raghuvir Pratap Singh S/o Bhagwan Sharan Singh, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Ward No.6 Yadav Para, Banahil, P.O. Pakaria, P.S. Mulmula, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Agricultural Development and Farmers Welfare and Biotechnology, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalay Through The Registrar, Krishak Nagar, Purena, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Academic Council Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalay, Krishak Nagar, Purena, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Director of Instruction Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalay, Krishak Nagar, Purena, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Through Chairperson, Vyapam Bhavan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Controller of Examination Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Vyapam Bhavan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.08.19 10:40:51 +0530 2 / 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Kishore Narayan, Advocate For State /Respondents No.1 : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. GA For Respondents No.2, 3 & 4 : Mr. D.N. Prajapati, Advocate For Respondents No.5 & 6 : Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 18/08/2025 1. After arguing for sometime learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to fila a better constituted petition. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu