Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40682 (CHH)

GURUSHARAN SINGH BEDI (G.S. BEDI.) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9865/2025 · 2025-08-21

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9865 of 2025 1 - Gurusharan Singh Bedi (G.S. Bedi.) S/o Shri Manmohan Singh Bedi Aged About 57 Years Working As Principal At Government Polytechnic Jashpur, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Skill Development, Technical Education And Employment, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate, Skill Development, Technical Education And Employment, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Shri Raman Mehar Aged About 63 Years Near Surya Mall, Surya Vihar, Kohka Junwani Road, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer Hon ’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 22/08/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition on the grievance that though the transfer order has been issued on 30.06.2025, the petitioner is not being relieved. SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.08.23 11:11:37 +0530 2 2. The issue regarding implementation of transfer order has been considered by this Court in the case of Ms. Manisha Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others, 2015(4) C.G.L.J.182, wherein relying upon several judgments of the Supreme Court it has been held by this Court that once the employee has been transferred it is required to be complied with unless it is modified, varied or cancelled. Therefore, in these circumstances, either the transfer order has to be implemented or the State has the option to cancel, vary or modify or keep in abeyance. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that if the transfer order of the petitioner is still operative, the respondent authorities shall relieve the petitioner towards implementation of the transfer order. 4. It is also made clear that if any administrative exigency impede the petitioners' relieving, the petitioner shall be informed in writing. It will also remain open for the respondents to reconsider the issue of transfer on account of any administrative exigency. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika