Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(122)
CWP-9079-2025 Decided on :01.04.2025 Manpreet Kaur ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and others
……Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: Mr. Harkirat Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab.
***** Deepak Sibal, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Nabha, District Patiala to take a decision on the representation dated 07.02.2025 (Annexure P-4) moved by the petitioner.
2.
Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted.
3.
Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3- Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Nabha, District Patiala to take a decision on the aforesaid representation moved by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, preferably within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.04.02 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh
CWP-9079-2025
-2-
4.
Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.
(DEEPAK SIBAL)
JUDGE
(SUMEET GOEL) April 01, 2025
JUDGE Naveen
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.04.02 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh