APHC010079242019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 3522/2019 Between: 1. DASARI MARIYABABU, S/O KANAKA SUNDARA RAO AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, AGRICULTUR, R/O VADLAMUDIVARIPALEM, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET DIVISION, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET TALUK POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET TALUK POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. DASARI MARIYAKUMARI, W/O PEDA KOTESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O S.C. COLONY, ISSAPALEM VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. G L NAGESWAR RAO The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.3522 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th and 5th respondents in interfering with civil disputes and calling the petitioner to the police station for settlement of the disputes in between the petitioner and the 6th respondent in pursuance of the legal notice dt.26-2-2019 without having jurisdiction is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principals of natural justice.” 2. Sri T.Kuladeep, learned counsel representing Sri G.V.S.Mehar Kumar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner present. Sri G.L.Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the respondents No.4 and 5 present. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the matter is civil in nature. Hence, police will not interfere in the matter, as it is civil in nature. 4. The submissions of the learned Additional Government Pleader for Home are placed on record. 4 5. The allegation in the writ petition is that police interfering in civil dispute. In the light of submissions made by the learned Additional Government Pleader for Home that the matter is civil in nature and police will not interfere in the matter, it does not require any further orders, and the writ petition is liable to be closed. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission without going into merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.11.2025 PSK 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 48 WRIT PETITION No:3522 OF 2019 Date: 03.11.2025 W PSK