[2025:RJ-JP:50163] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19347/2025 Sunil Kumar Saini S/o Shri Ishwar Lal Saini, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Pratapgarh, Tehsil Thanagazi, Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Alwar, District Alwar (Raj.) 4. The Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Block Thanagazi, Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan). 5. The Medical Officer Incharge, Primary Health Center Samra, Block Thanagazi, Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan). 6. The Rajasthan Medical Relief Society, Primary Health Center Samra, Block Thanagazi, Alwar, District Alwar Through Its Member Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “1. The respondents be directed to forward the name of petitioner along with requisite documents for screening under Rajasthan [2025:RJ-JP:50163] (2 of 3) [CW-19347/2025] Contractual Hiring to Civil Post Rules 2022 for the purpose of regularizing the services of the petitioner on the post of Machine with Men (Computer Operator) and further the respondents be directed to allow the petitioner to continue on Machine with Men (Computer Operator) through RMRS and further the respondents be also directed to increase the wages / remuneration of the petitioner and directed to calculate the arrears accrued thereof and release the same with interest; 2. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, respondents may kindly be directed to make payment of the salary of the petitioner on monthly basis and further the respondents be directed to pay the due salary in favour of the petitioner with interest and the respondents be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization; 3. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper on the facts and in the circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the Petitioner with cost of the petition.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all [2025:RJ-JP:50163] (3 of 3) [CW-19347/2025] grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/99