1 / 3 2025:CGHC:43524 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4602 of 2025 Airun Bibi W/o Shakil Ahmad Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Tara, Bazar Para, Tahsil Premnagar, Police Station Premnagar, District Surajpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.) 3 - M/s Rajasthan Rajya Viduyut Upadan Nigam Limited Vidyut Bhawan, Janpad Jyoti Nagar, Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan 4 - Tahsildar Premnagar, District Surajpur (C.G.) 5 - Sub-Divisional Officer (R) Land Acquisition Officer, Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. V.K. Pandey, Advocate For State : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. GA (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 28/08/2025 ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.08.29 17:42:07 +0530 2 / 3 1. By way of the instant petition, the petitioner is challenging the initiation of proceeding for mutation of the name of the Respondent No.3 in the revenue records by the Respondent No.4. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the Respondent No.3 has not given just and fair compensation to the petitioner in lieu of acquisition of land and the application for enhancement of the compensation is pending consideration before the Respondent No.2, however, despite that the Respondent No.4 has initiated the proceeding for mutation of the name of the Respondent No.3 in place of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that at this juncture the respondent authorities may be directed to decide the application Anneuxre P/2 within a stipulated time frame. 3. Learned State counsel would submit that she has no objection in deciding the pending application of the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the documents with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, it is directed that Respondent No.2 shall decide the application/representation made by the petitioner dated 14/10/2024 (Annexure P/2) expeditiously as early as possible. 3 / 3 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the application of the petitioner on its own merits. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu