Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4066 (AP)

NAMANA VENKAYYA NAIDU v. POLISETTI DANAYYA NAIDU

CRP/294/2022 · 2025-07-10

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010027762022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 294/2022 Between: 1. NAMANA VENKAYYA NAIDU, S/O LATE RAJA RAO,AGED 74 YEARS,OCC BUSINESS C/O GOWTHAM THEATRE,MAIN ROAD,PAYAKARAOPET,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 2. NAMANA SURYA RAO, S/O LATE RAJA RAO,AGED 69 YEARS, ,OCC BUSINESS C/O GOWTHAM THEATRE,MAIN ROAD,PAYAKARAOPET,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 3. NAMANA KANNA RAJU, S/O LATE RAJA RAO,AGED 65 YEARS,OCC BUSINESS C/O GOWTHAM THEATRE,MAIN ROAD,PAYAKARAOPET,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. NAMANA RAJA BABU, S/O LATE RAMA MURTHY,AGED 61 YEARS,OCC BUSINESS C/O GOWTHAM THEATRE,MAIN ROAD,PAYAKARAOPET,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. POLISETTI DANAYYA NAIDU, S/o Late Veera Swamy Naidu,Aged 60 years,Occ Business D.No.12-107,Ganesh Bhavan,Hotel and Lodge,Main Road,Payakaraopet,Visakhapatnam District ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to direct to expedite the OS No.106/2019 on the file of Junior Civil Judge Yelamanchili,Visakhapatnam District and dispose off the same at earliest possible and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P VIVEK Counsel for the Respondent: 1. POLISETTY RADHA KRISHNA The Court made the following: ORDER: The present revision is filed questioning the delay in the disposal of O.S. No. 106 of 2019 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Yelamanchili, Visakhapatnam. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the lis between the parties has been amicably settled out of court. 3. The submission is placed on record. 4. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 11th July, 2025 cbn 146 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.294 of 2022 11th July, 2025 cbn