Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010216792017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5330/2017 Between:
1. S. PADMAVATI, W/O LATE NARSINGA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC : BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.49/44-21/2, AKKAYYA PALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM- 16.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PROHIBITION & EXCISE DEPARMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE COMMISSIONER PROHIBITION
EXCISE, DEPARTMENT, NEAR DEVI PLAZA, PRASADAPADU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHA DISTRICT.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PROHIBITION, EXCISE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. THE SUPERINTENDENT PROHIBITION
EXCISE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER PROHIBITION EXCISE, VISAKHAPATNAM-III, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 2 to 5 in not refunding the amount of Rs.41,000/- paid through challan No.47960 dt.25.07.2015 towards shifting fee and Rs.10,25,000/- paid through challan No.49470 dt.28.07.2015 towards renewal license fee for the period of last three months of 2015-16 to the petitioner and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 to refund the same with interest @ 12% p.a. w.e.f. 01.11.2016 and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 6477 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5 to
2 refund the Rs.41,000/- paid through challan No.47960 dt.25.07.2015 towards shifting fee and Rs.10,25,000/- paid through challan No.49470 dt.28.07.2015 towards renewal license fee for the period of last three months of 2015-16, pending disposal of writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hontle Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PROHIBITION (AP) The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.5330 of 2017
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time the cause in the writ petition has rendered infructuous. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 20.11.2025 KBN
4 09
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.5330 of 2017
Date: 20.11.2025
KBN