Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40657 (KAR)

SRI. G. V. ARUN v. SMT. JAYAMMA

CRP/28/2019 · 2025-10-28

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42959 CRP No. 28 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 28 OF 2019 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. G. V. ARUN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O B K GARLPAD NO. 87/1, EAST ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU - 560 004 REPRESETNED BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI R PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O LATE M RAMAIAH R/AT MATHRU SHREE NILAYA NO.3, 12TH MAIN ROAD J.P.NAGAR 5TH PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYA KRISHNA BHAT M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, W/O VENKATAPPA REDDY R/AT YELACHENHALLI K.K.P.ROAD BENGALURU - 560 078. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42959 CRP No. 28 of 2019 2. SMT. NAGAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, W/O NAGARAJA REDDY R/AT VASUDEVAPURA VILLAGE UTTARHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 078. 3. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, W/O RAMANJANEYA REDDY, R/AT UTTARHALLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 061. 4. SRI MUNIREDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE KONDA REDDY, R/AT HOSUR VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK - 562 109. 5. SRI KRISHNAREDDY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE KONDA REDDY, R/AT HOSUR VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK - 562 109. 6. SMT. GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O VENKATESH REDDY, R/AT KAGGALIPURA UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 061. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42959 CRP No. 28 of 2019 7. SMT. B S RAMAMANI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O C A RAMESH R/AT 860, 11TH B CROSS 22ND MAIN ROAD, JP NAGAR 2ND PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078 8. SRI ARUNKUMAR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, S/O MUNIREDDY, R/AT GOLLAHALLI HAMLET OF HOSUR VILLAGE HOSUR VILLAGE, BIDAI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK - 562 109. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B ROOPESHA FOR R2.,ADVOCATE) THIS CRP FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.01.2018 PASSED IN OS.NO.306/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARAM, DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a), (b) AND (d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLIANT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as under: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42959 CRP No. 28 of 2019 "The Petitioners submits that the suit in O.S.No.306/2009 from which the above revision has arisen has been disposed of on 02.08.2023. Hence, the present Petition has become infructuous. Therefore, it is prayed that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above Civil Revision Petition as having become infructuous, in the ends of justice and equity." Placing the memo on record, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn as it has rendered infructuous. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2 ct:SG