Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40656 (RAJ)

MOTIRAM MEENA S/O SHRI BHANWAR LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19080/2025 · 2025-12-09

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49936] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19080/2025 Motiram Meena S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Meena, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Kuttin Salwadi, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar, At Present R/o Radheshyam Colony, Sokhar Road, Kherli, District Alwar ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner 3. Joint Director, School Education, Jaipur Division, Jaipur 4. Chief District Education Officer, Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Kumar Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/12/2025 1. Considered submissions of learned counsel for petitioner. 2. Issue notice to respondent(s). 3. Service upon standing counsel is also permitted. 4. Mr. Vishal Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG accepts notice for respondent(s). 5. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG as counsel for respondent(s). 6. During course of argument, it has come to the notice of the Court that aggrieved from termination order, a departmental [2025:RJ-JP:49936] (2 of 2) [CW-19080/2025] appeal is filed before the respondent no.2, Director Secondary Education. 7. Learned counsel for respondent(s) suggest that the writ petition be disposed of with liberty to respondent no.2 to consider and decide the appeal filed aggrieved from impugned order. 8. Having considered the submissions, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file additional representation, if he desires to file to respondent no.2 within 15 days referring the legal position. 9. The respondent no.2 is directed to consider the decide the departmental appeal preferred by the department filed aggrieved from impugned termination order dated 04.11.2025. While considering additional representation, if any, filed by the petitioner within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of filing representation or otherwise from 30 days from receipt of copy of this order. 10. If petitioner is still aggrieved from decision by respondent no.2, he may re-approach this Court with fresh petition. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /236