M/s. Leena Construction, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/14550/2025 · 2025-10-30
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40653 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40653 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010288202025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 14550 OF 2025 Between:
1. M/S. LEENA CONSTRUCTION,, REPRESENTED BY IT'S PROPRIETOR/CONTRACTOR,
C. SUBHAN BASHA, S/O. C.
VENKATA SUBBAIAH, OFFICE AT. PLOT NO. 48, LAWYERS COLONY, 0PP. TELUGU GANGA COLONY, PODALAKUR ROAD, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE- 524004. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, R AND B DEPARTMENT, GOVT., OF AP, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R AND B DEPARTMENT, GOVT., OF AP, (R AND B) CIRCLE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DEPARTMENT, GOVT, OF AP (R AND B) DIVISION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DEPARTMENT, GOVT, OF AP (R AND B) SUB-DIVISION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2
7. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DEPARTMENT, GOVT, OF AP (R AND B) BUILDINGS SECTION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SHAIK MEERAVALI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Sri Shaik Meeravali, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri Sk. Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings and Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning. 2 Para 5 of the Counter-Affidavit filed by Respondent No.5 would indicate that the said Respondent has admitted that the net amount due to the Writ Petitioner is Rs.63,21,908/-, and that the said amount has not been uploaded onto the NIDHI Portal due to insufficient budget. 3. Having considered the same, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this Writ Petition with a direction to all the Departments, including the Administrative Department and the Finance Department, to complete all the administrative formalities, including the uploading of the bills onto the NIDHI Portal within a period of twenty (20) weeks from today, and to transfer the said amount to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within four (04) weeks thereafter. 4.
Writ Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of the bank account details to the Competent Authority within a period of two (02) weeks from today. 3
5. With these observations and directions, the Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J
Dt: 31.10.2025 DSV
4
155
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 14550 OF 2025
31.10.2025
DSV
5
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 14550 OF 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. No
DATE ORDER Office Note
05. 31.10.2025 GRKP, J
Writ Petition is allowed. (vide separate order)
___________
GRKP, J DSV