Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040000702025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/9/2025 Eho Menjo Son of Jiki Menjo, resident of Pachin Colony, PO and PS Naharlagun, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors represented by the Secretary, RWD cum Chief Executive Officer, ARRDA, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Chief Engineer PMGSY Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Work Circle Rupa West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : Tender Evaluation Committee Rupa West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Executive Engineer / PIU Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Work Department Page No.# 2/3 Bameng Division East Kameng Arunachal Pradesh. 6:M/s GYT Trading Centre Age: 0 Occupation : represented by it proprietor Mrs Tar Munni resident of Ganga Market Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:M/S Capital Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Miss Senbom Taipodia resident of C Sector Naharlagun PO and PS Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Preety Moyong, Advocate for the Respondent : Gimi Tarak, SC (RWD) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 17.01.2025 Heard Ms. T. Rimi, learned counsel for the applicant. By filing this application, the applicant has prayed for review of the order dated 23.12.2024, passed by this Court in WP(C)618(AP)2024, particularly, for correction of inadvertent typographical error. Vide order dated 23.12.2024, this Court has directed the petitioner to take Page No.# 3/3 steps for service of notice upon the respondents No.5 and 6, which is, in fact, ought to have been for respondents No.6 and 7. Having considered that such a direction for steps ought to have been for respondents No.6 and 7, the present application is allowed. Accordingly, the order dated 23.12.2024, passed in WP(C)618(AP)2024 in the last three lines, the petitioner is directed to take for service of notice upon the respondents No.5 and 6 by registered post with A/d as well as dasti mode shall be substituted as respondents No.6 and 7 instead of respondents No.5 and 6. This order shall be read as a part of the order dated 23.12.2024. The I.A. stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant