Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40646 (BOM)

SHANKARGONDA NANASO PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY AND ORS

IA/11304/2024 · 2025-09-23

Sharmila U Deshmukh, Shri M S Karnik

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

501-11304-24-IA=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11304 OF 2024 IN CIVIL WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO. 21481 OF 2023 Shankargonda Nanaso Patil … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents …………. Mr. Utkarsh Desai i/b Prashant Bhavake for the applicant. Mr. Anand Shalgaonkar, AGP for the respondent - State. …………. Coram : M. S. Karnik & Sharmila U. Deshmukh, JJ. Date : September 23, 2025. P. C. : 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 2. This Interim Application seeks recall of the order dated 1st April 2024 passed by the Registrar (Judicial-I) dismissing the petition for non- removal of the office objections within the stipulated period and for condonation of delay of 22 days in filing the present Interim Application. Uday S. Jagtap 1 of 2 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2025.09.23 17:48:27 +0530 501-11304-24-IA=.doc 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that due to oversight time which was granted for removal of office objections was not noticed, failing which the conditional order came into effect and the petition came to be dismissed. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 22 days is condoned. The order dated 1st April 2024 is recalled and the present petition is restored to its original number. 5. The Interim Application is allowed. 6. List the petition for further consideration on 30th September 2025. [ Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik ] Uday S. Jagtap 2 of 2