MANJU GARG D/O SHRI NATHU LAL GARG v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16547/2025 · 2025-11-06
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40641 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40641 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44626] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16547/2025
1. Manju Garg D/o Shri Nathu Lal Garg, Aged About 58 Years, R/o D-8-9, Aditya Mil Colony, Madanganj- Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Presently Working On The Post Of Teacher Level-I In Mahatma Gandhi Govt. School Azad Nagar, Kishangarh, Ajmer
2. Savitri Devi Yadav D/o Shri Kishori Lal Yadav W/o Mahavir Prasad, Aged About 58 Years, R/o 41, Prakash Enclave, Govind Vihar, Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror, At Present Working On The Post Of Pti Grade-Iii In Govt. Girls Sr. Secondary School Nareheda, District Kotputli-Behror.
3. Mahesh Chand Hinduniya S/o Mangal Chand Hinduniya, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village And Post Ramsar, Via Nasirabad District Ajmer Presently Working On The Post Of Lecturer (History) In Govt. Sr. Secondary School Gothiyana Block Arian District Ajmer. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
4. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Ajmer.
5. District Education Officer, Secondary Education-Kotputli- Behror. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 06/11/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:44626] (2 of 3) [CW-16547/2025]
1.
Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon order dated 25.04.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8352/2025 titled as Shivraj Bairwa and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be
disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order.
2. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of order dated 25.04.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8352/2025 titled as Shivraj Bairwa and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur on the basis of ration laid down in case of Yogesh Kumar Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan: SB CWP No.3534/2009 decided on 20.01.2014.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners
[2025:RJ-JP:44626] (3 of 3) [CW-16547/2025] are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. Needlees to say that if petitioners are entitled to benefit, then same be extended in terms of the orders as mentioned hereinabove.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /104