Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40634 (AP)

M/S. CHAITANYA EXPORTS AND IMPORTS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/17368/2023 · 2025-11-02

R Raghunandan Rao, Subhendu Samanta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010339232023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3559] MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 17368/2023 Between: 1. M/S. CHAITANYA EXPORTS AND IMPORTS, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY AND MANAGING PARTNER, SRI RACHURI KANAKA RAO 4-45-18 F 301 SRI SAIKIRAN APARTMENT PEDAWALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530017, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER II, BHEEMILI CIRCLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DIVISION 3. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, CHINAWALTAIR CIRCLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DIVISION 4. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ST, CHINAWALTAIR CIRCLE, VISAKHAPATNAM - I ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS or such other writ declaring the 2 RRR,J & SS,J W.P.No.17368 of 2023 Assessment Order dated 06.03.2020 bearing AO No. 200895 dated 06.03.2020 passed by the 3rd Respondent and the subsequent demand notice dated 20.01.2023 and the notice of attachment dated 13.03.2023 and 04.07.2023 issued by the 2nd Respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the Assessment Order dated 06.03.2020 bearing AO No. 200895 dated 06.03.2020 passed by the 3rd Respondent and the subsequent demand notice dated 20.01_2023 and the notice of attachment dated 13.03.2023 and 04.07.2023 issued by the 2nd Respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N A RAMACHANDRA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX 3 RRR,J & SS,J W.P.No.17368 of 2023 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition with the instructions of the petitioner. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Date:03.11.2025 KPV 4 RRR,J & SS,J W.P.No.17368 of 2023 157 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION No:17368 of 2023 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 03.11.2025 KPV