$~On mentioning * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 56/2025 THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC, Mr Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr M S Akhtar, Advocates. versus AJAY BAJPAI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R % 04.02.2025 1. The matter is taken up today on oral mentioning of Mr Pathak, the learned counsel for the appellants. He points out that a typographical error has crept in paragraph 35 of the judgment dated 23.01.2025 insofar it records “…and accordingly, the impugned judgment is set aside”. 2. We have perused the judgment dated 23.01.2025 and find that a typographical error has indeed crept in the same. Accordingly, paragraph 35 of the judgment dated 23.01.2025 stands rectified to read as under: “35. In the given circumstances, we find no infirmity with the decision of the learned Single Judge and accordingly, the impugned judgment is upheld.” 3. This order be appended as a corrigendum to the judgment dated 23.01.2025. VIBHU BAKHRU, J ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J FEBRUARY 04, 2025/M This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/02/2025 at 11:00:44