Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010568782025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE WRIT PETITION NO: 29524/2025 Between:
1. KODAVALI RAVI KUMAR, S/O RAGENDRA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC FP SHOP DEALER WATCHMAN,
2. KODAVALI VISRANTAMMA, W/O RAVI KUMAR, AGED YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, NOTE BOTH ARE R/O HOUSE NO 7 184, 5/1 LANE, BONGARALABEEDU, GUNTUR. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, 16TH FLOOR, CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, SHAHID BHAGAT SING MARG, MUMBAI -
2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, CAN FILL HOMES LIMITED, (SPONCER CANARA BANK), DOOR NO 4 FLOOR, KORITEPADU MAIN ROAD. BESIDE HARI HARA MAHAL THEATRE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Manda not taking any action on the Petitioners representation/complaint dated 24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 29524/2025 KODAVALI RAVI KUMAR, S/O RAGENDRA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC FP SHOP DEALER WATCHMAN, KODAVALI VISRANTAMMA, W/O RAVI KUMAR, AGED YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, NOTE BOTH ARE R/O HOUSE NO 7 184, 5/1 LANE, BONGARALABEEDU, GUNTUR. GUNTUR ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, 16TH FLOOR, CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, SHAHID BHAGAT SING 400 001, INDIA. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, CAN FILL HOMES LIMITED, (SPONCER CANARA BANK), DOOR NO 4-1-1, GAYATHRI BAZAR, FLOOR, KORITEPADU MAIN ROAD.
BESIDE HARI HARA MAHAL THEATRE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): tion under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the Respondent for not taking any action on the Petitioners representation/complaint dated 24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3558] THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA KODAVALI RAVI KUMAR, S/O RAGENDRA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT KODAVALI VISRANTAMMA, W/O RAVI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, NOTE BOTH ARE R/O HOUSE NO 7-6- 184, 5/1 LANE, BONGARALABEEDU, GUNTUR. GUNTUR ...PETITIONER(S) THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, 16TH FLOOR, CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, CAN FILL HOMES LIMITED, 1, GAYATHRI BAZAR, FLOOR, KORITEPADU MAIN ROAD. BESIDE HARI HARA MAHAL ...RESPONDENT(S): tion under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in mus to declaring the action of the Respondent for not taking any action on the Petitioners representation/complaint dated 24-09-
2 CMR,J& GTK,J W.P.No.29524 of 2025
2025 against the 2ND Respondent for issuance the notice under Section 13(13) of SARFAICE Act dated 03-04-2025 by treating the Petitioners account as NPA Non-performing Assets from 31-03- 2025 while receiving the instalment amounts is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and the Constitution of India and also against the guidelines/rules of the Reserve Bank of India consequently direct the Respondent by conducting the inquiry on my representation/complaint dated 24- 09-2025 and take necessary action against the 2ND Respondent by set aside advocate Commissioner notice dated 18-10-2025 which is served on me 21-10- 2025 and pass such other order or orders as this Honble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.
IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. CH VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. 3 CMR,J& GTK,J W.P.No.29524 of 2025
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
Mr. K.Tarun, learned counsel representing Mr. Ch. Vidyasagar, learned counsel for the writ petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 30.10.2025 MDP