Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40629 (PNJ)

SUNIL KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/17427/2025 · 2025-04-04

Manjari Nehru Kaul

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

228. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Sunil Kumar State of Punjab CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KA 1. BNSS, 2023, for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. dated 27.12.2022, under Se Station Sujanpur, Di 2. submitted that the trial is nearing conclusion with only two prosecution witnesses remaining to be examined very shortly. 3. the concession of bail to the petitioner at this stage. dismissed accordingly. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: Sunil Kumar Versus State of Punjab HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Kanisth Ganeriwala, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shiva Khurmi, AAG, Punjab ----- MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) This is third petition that has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. .12.2022, under Section 18 of NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police Sujanpur, District Pathankot. At the outset, learned State counsel, on instructions, has submitted that the trial is nearing conclusion with only two prosecution witnesses remaining to be examined. Hence, the trial would be concluding very shortly. In the circumstances, this Court does not deem it fit to extend the concession of bail to the petitioner at this stage. dismissed accordingly. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17427-2025 Date of decision: 04.04.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondent HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shiva Khurmi, AAG, Punjab with ASI Dalbir Singh. This is third petition that has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.175, of NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police At the outset, learned State counsel, on instructions, has submitted that the trial is nearing conclusion with only two prosecution . Hence, the trial would be concluding cumstances, this Court does not deem it fit to extend the concession of bail to the petitioner at this stage. Present petition stands This is third petition that has been filed under Section 483 of , of NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police At the outset, learned State counsel, on instructions, has submitted that the trial is nearing conclusion with only two prosecution . Hence, the trial would be concluding cumstances, this Court does not deem it fit to extend Present petition stands SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.04.05 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-17427-2025 - 2 - 4. However, since petitioner has been in custody since 27.12.2022, the trial Court shall ensure expeditious conclusion of the trial, preferably within the next three months. 5. It is made clear that anything observed hereinabove shall not be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE April 04, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.04.05 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document