[2025:RJ-JP:51296-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1522/2025 Sattu Ufr Satyanarayan S/o Shri Balaji Gujar, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ganeshpura, Police Station Kaithun District Kota (Raj.) Through His Brother Shri Ram Gopal, Son Of Shri Bal Ji, Resident Of 91, Gram Ganeshpura, Prahaladpura, Dhakarkheri, Dhakadkhedi, Kota (Raj.) (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Deputy Secretary To The Government, Depart Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Prisoners Open Air Camp Advisory Committee, Through Its, Directors, Directorate Prison, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 4. The Director General Of Prisons, Directorate Prison Rajasthan Jaipur (Rajasthan). 5. Superintendent Central Jail, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Aggarwal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Amar Kumar, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 16/12/2025 Accused petitioner has filed this Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) seeking first regular parole for a period of 20 days. [2025:RJ-JP:51296-DB] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1522/2025] 2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that jail conduct of the petitioner is satisfactory. It is further contended that the accused-petitioner has remained in custody for a period of more than four years, therefore the petitioner be released on first regular parole for a period of 20 days. 3. Learned GA-cum-AAG has opposed the writ petition and contends that Superintendent of Police has not recommended case of the petitioner for grant of benefit of parole. He contends that the case in which accused-petitioner is undergoing sentence being of serious nature, it might affect the society as well as complainant if he is released on parole. 4. In counter to the above, counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the report of the social welfare department is in favour of the petitioner and the jail conduct of the petitioner, as reported by the Superintendent, Special Central Jail, Shylawas, Dausa is also satisfactory. 5. We have considered the contentions. 6. Since jail conduct of the petitioner is satisfactory and no documentary evidence in support of adverse police report has been placed on record to deny the prayer for grant of first regular parole to the petitioner, we deem it proper to allow present writ petition (parole) and set aside the order dated 6.8.2025 qua the petitioner. 7. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) is accordingly, allowed. The order dated 6.8.2025 of the District Parole Advisory Committee, Kota qua the petitioner is quashed. The Jail Authorities are directed to release the petitioner on first regular parole for a period of 20 days on furnishing his personal bonds of [2025:RJ-JP:51296-DB] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1522/2025] Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent with the stipulation that he shall surrender himself before the Jail Authorities on the expiry of parole period and shall maintain peace and tranquility during parole period. 8. In case of failure to surrender by stipulated date, the Jail Authorities shall proceed in accordance with Law. 9. Registrar (Judicial) is directed to send a copy of this order to concerned Jail Superintendent by fax today itself for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J DK/33