Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4062 (GAU)

Ojing Jomyang and Anr v. The State of AP and 7 Ors

PIL/2/2025 · 2025-04-28

Kardak Ete

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040000592025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : PIL/2/2025 Ojing Jomyang and Anr Son of Shri Talem Jomyang, resident of Kerang Village, PO and PS Kaying, Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Taken Palong Age: Occupation : Son of Late Takeng Palong resident of Kaying Village PO and PS Kaying Siang District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 7 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Secretary PWD Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : PWD Central Zone B Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 4:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Page No.# 2/3 PWD Boleng Circle Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : PWD Rumgong Division Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Siang District Boelng Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 7:The Extra Assistant Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Kaying Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 8:M/s Marpi Wire Product Age: 0 Occupation : Sipu Colony PO and PS Aalo West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioners : Orin Modi, Advocate Advocate for the Respondents : Mr. R.H. Nabam, Addl. A.G., Arunachal Pradesh Page No.# 3/3 – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE 29-04-2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, C.J.) Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, submits that he wants to withdraw this PIL petition. However, he prays for liberty to file a fresh PIL petition with better particulars. Learned Additional Advocate General, Arunachal Pradesh appearing for the respondents has no objection if the liberty, as prayed for, is granted. In view of the above, this PIL petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant