DALEEP SINGH S/O PURAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16336/2025 · 2025-12-09
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40618 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40618 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49977] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16336/2025
1. Daleep Singh S/o Puran Singh, R/o Vill- Buteri, Tehsil- Bansur, District- Kotputli Behror Presently At Yagya Bhawan, Rptc Kishanangarh, Ajmer (Raj) 305801
2. Chhelu Singh Rathore S/o Ugam Singh Rathore, R/o Village Khariyan Kan Singh Post And Tehsil Ghantiyali District Phalodi 342311 Presently At Yagya Bhawan, Rptc Kishangarh, Ajmer (Raj) 305801
3. Krishna Ahari S/o Heeralal Ahari, R/o Vpo Thana, Tehsil- Nayagaon, District Udaipur Presently At Yagya Bhawan, Rptc Kishangarh, Ajmer (Raj) 305801
4. Rishabh Ranka S/o Pukhraj Ranka, R/o Rk Colony Asind Bhilwara Presently At Yagya Bhawan, Rptc Kishangarh, Ajmer (Raj) 305801
5. Sunita D/o Norang Singh, R/o Vpo Jerthi Tehsil And District Sikar Presently At Yagya Bhawan, Rptc Kishangarh, Ajmer (Raj) 305801
6. Vikash Kumar Dhaker S/o Kailash Chandra, R/o Bijoliyan, Bhilwara Presently At Yagya Bhawan, Rptc Kishangarh, Ajmer (Raj) 305801
7. Sangita Choudhary D/o Kajodmal Jat, R/o Vill- Modi, Amer, Jaipur Presently At Yagya Bhawan, Rptc Kishangarh, Ajmer (Raj) 305801
8. Praveen Singh S/o Narpat Singh, R/o Bhinmal, Jalore Presently At Yagya Bhawan, Rptc Kishangarh, Ajmer (Raj) 305801
9. Ravi Kumar Maan S/o Mohan Lal Maan, R/o Ward No. 8, Sethawali Dhani, Ravpura, Jaipur, Raj 303804 Presently At Rptc Jodhpur, Mandore Road, Mandore, Jodhpur
10. Chandra Kant Meena S/o Mahendra Kumar Meena, R/o 290, Ward No 1, Meeno Ka Mohalla, Nender, Jaipur 302013 Presently At Rptc Jodhpur, Mandore Road, Mandore, Jodhpur Pincode 342007 ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary Department Of Home Government Of Rajasthan
[2025:RJ-JP:49977] (2 of 4) [CW-16336/2025] Secretariate Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters District Jaipur Rajasthan
3. Office Of The Principal, Rajasthan Police Training Centre, Kishangarh, Yagya Bhawan, Rptc Kishangarh, Ajmer (Raj.) 305801
4. Office Of The Principal, Rajasthan Police Training Centre, Jodhpur , (Rptc) Jodhpur, Mandore Road, Mandore, Jodhpur 342007 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Singh Mr. Pradeep Kumar Malakar Mr. Tribhuvan Singh Rajpoot Mr. Naman Sirvi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sami Khan for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/12/2025
1. The petitioners are Sub-Inspector selected during process of recruitment of Sub-Inspector 2021. 2.
The writ petition is preferred with following prayer: a. Issue appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the Respondents to forthwith implement Order No. DGP/PS/40-45 dated 10.01.2025, issued by the Director General of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur, whereby all training and field programmes of Sub-Inspector/Platoon Commander trainees under the Recruitment-2021 were suspended, and it was directed that the trainees be stationed
[2025:RJ-JP:49977] (3 of 4) [CW-16336/2025] at their respective District / Battalion Headquarters till further orders; b. Issue appropriate directions permitting the Petitioners to report back to their respective Districts / Units, where the ordinary Police Lines rules shall apply in place of the Training Centre regulations; and further direct the Respondents to grant admissible casual leave and allow the Petitioners to reside with their families during the period of suspension of training, till resumption of the remaining course, if any. The material on record as referred by learned counsel for parties clearly indicated that challenge to the recruitment process of Sub-Inspector 2021 is still pending before the Division Bench of this Court and presently, final hearing is in progress. There are orders passed by learned Single Judge, Division Bench and also by Hon’ble Supreme Court, in cases filed to challenge the appointment or recruitment process for posts of Sub-Inspector. 3. Having considered the complex issue of pending litigation, the counsel for respondents suggests that petitioners may file a representation to respondent No.2 who shall consider the representation in light of orders passed till date by this Hon’ble Court or Hon’ble Supreme Court and after considering parity, if applicable, as referred by learned counsel for petitioner. 4.
Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the
[2025:RJ-JP:49977] (4 of 4) [CW-16336/2025] respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation, but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E- mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /256