KAMAL NAYAN SINGH AND 3 OTHERS v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/4588/2024 · 2025-10-07
Ajay Bhanot, Garima Prashad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40618 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40618 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4588 of 2024 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Sri Thakur Prasad Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the charge-sheet was filed during the pendency of writ petition. The charge sheet has been challenged by instituting proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed.
October 8, 2025 Sachin Mishra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Thakur Prasad Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Chandra Shekhar Mishra, G.A. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Kamal Nayan Singh And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad