BHAGWAN DAS S/O LAKSHMAN DAS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5097/2025 · 2025-12-09
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40615 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40615 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50042] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5097/2025 Bhagwan Das S/o Lakshman Das, R/o 19, Shree Ji Jhomes, G-12, Golyawas, New Sanganer Road, Muhana, Jaipur City ( South). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, P.h.q. Lalkothi, Jaipur.
3. Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur.
4. S.h.o. Police Station Muhana, Jaipur City ( South). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms.Chhavi Chaturvedi for Mr.Krishan Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr.Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG Mr.Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 09/12/2025
1. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking directions for fair, proper and impartial investigation in F.I.R. No.204/2025 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South).
2. As per the pleadings of the misc. petition that the F.I.R. was registered against the accused person on 21.02.2025, but the Police is not proceeding in a fair and proper manner, so appropriate directions be issued to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fair and impartial investigation.
[2025:RJ-JP:50042] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5097/2025]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that the matter is still at investigation stage and it will take its own time & motion, therefore, directions sought for should not be granted.
4. Looking to the fact that the F.I.R. has been registered in the month of February, 2025, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is at liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C., in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, before the Court concerned to get the status report of the investigation.
5. In case, any application, as mentioned above, is submitted by the petitioner before the trial court, appropriate orders shall be passed by the Court concerned strictly in accordance with law.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /29