APHC010214722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1075/2025 Between: 1. K. ANDRAIAH, S/O. PILAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 5/1/217, SIVANAGAR, BADVWL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDHI, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (FAC) PR RD DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI KRISHNA TEJA MYLAVARAPU, COMMISSIONER, PR RD DEPARTMENT, THADEPALLI, A.P. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents no 1 and 2 to punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for their willful violation of order of this Honble Court passed in W.P. No. 6925 of 2024, dated 07.08.2024, by the Honble Learned Single Judge and to pass s Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATASUBBAIAH V Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case has been filed complaining of the violation of the order dated 07.08.2024, passed in W.P.No.6925 of 2024. Page 2 of 3 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. W.P.No.6925 of 2024 was disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side, directing the respondent authorities to conclude the inquiry, strictly in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.91, dated 12.09.2022. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was pleaded that the respondent authorities failed to comply with the order dated 07.08.2024. 5. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted the copy of G.O.Ms.No.93 Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (Vig.V) Department, dated 10.11.2025, wherein the authority imposed punishment against the petitioner after completing the inquiry. 6. A perusal of G.O.Ms.No.93, dated 10.11.2025, the Panchayat Secretary to Government issued the proceedings and imposed penalty of withholding entire pension under Rule 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980, however, with certain delay. 7. Since an order has been passed by the authority, this Court does not find any violation of the order dated 07.08.2024, passed in W.P.No.6925 of 2024 and the contempt case is liable to be dismissed. 8. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 14.11.2025 TVN 134 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.1075 OF 2025 Date: 14.11.2025 TVN