M/S MALIK INDUSTRIES TH. BASHARAT MALIK. v. STATE TH. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. AND ORS.
WP(C)/2139/2019 · 2025-02-28
Rajnesh Oswal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4061 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4061 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP (C) No. 2139/2019
M/s Malik Industries
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
vs
State of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. S. S. Nanda, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 28.02.2025
1. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last two dates of hearing. Same is the position today also. It seems that petitioner has lost in prosecuting the present petition.
2. Hence, the present petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu: 28.02.2025 Suraj 71 Rakesh Kumar 2025.03.04 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document