- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52634-DB C.C.C. No.515/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.515/2023 BETWEEN: SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR D. BANDI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O DHAREPPA YANKAPPA UPPAR R/AT NO.148/6-01 5TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN SADASHIVANAGAR BENGALURU 560080. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. PRITHVEESH M.K. ADV.,) AND: 1. SRI. G. KUMAR NAIK COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU 560020. 2. SMT. B.S. BASANTHI LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD K P WEST, BENGALURU 560020. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. SACHIN B.S. ADV., FOR A1 & A2) Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52634-DB C.C.C. No.515/2023 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS-ACCUSED FOR HAVING DELIBERATELY AND WILLFULLY DISOBEYED THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 28.11.2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.23609/2022 (LA-BDA) PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENTS FOR HAVING WILLFULLY AND DELIBERATELY DISOBEYING THE ORDERS PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AND FURTHER ENFORCE THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) This contempt petition is filed alleging non compliance of the directions of the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.23609/2022 dated 28.11.2022. The direction was to the accused/respondent to consider the representation dated 03.01.2018 at Annexure-E and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52634-DB C.C.C. No.515/2023 2. A memo has been placed on record by the accused along with an endorsement dated 25.09.2024. It is submitted that the request of the complainant/petitioner in the representation has been rejected. 3. In view of the fact that the direction was to consider the representation and pass orders in accordance with law, accepting the memo and the endorsement, the contempt of Court case is closed with liberty to the complainant to challenge the endorsement, if so advised. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 3 Sl No.: 35