ANAND KUMARI VERMA AND 62 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIA/9029/2025 · 2025-07-31
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:129081 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9029 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anand Kumari Verma And 62 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag,Mahesh Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hare Ram,Kaushlesh Pratap Singh Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
1. The instant petition has been filed with following prayers:-
"I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to commence the two year BTC Training through correspondence course of the petitioner forthwith in compliance to the Government Order, dated 06.09.1994, 27.12.2004 and 22.04.2005 as well as judgment date 12.04.2018 Writ-A No. 11202 of 2008 and to complete the same, in the interest of justice (Annexure No. 14). II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to issue the BTC training through correspondence course, certificate to the petitioners on completion of BTC Training through correspondence course. III. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the representation of petitioners dated 31.01.2025, within a reasonable time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, keeping in mind the government order dated 06.09.1994, 27.12.2004 and 22.04.2005 as well as judgment date 12.4.2018 Writ A.: 11202 of 2008 (Annexure No. 14)."
2. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel as well as Mr. Kaushlesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondents, Basic Education Officers, Auraiya and Etawah, that there are 63 petitioners in the instant petition, however, the requisite details, of all of them, have not been mentioned.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid fact and prays that this petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file separate petitions on behalf of each petitioner mentioning all the relevant details.
4. Taking note of aforesaid submission, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad