Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:52008
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1388 of 2019 1 - Smt. Vijyeta Swarnkar W/o Shri Pradip Soni Aged About 37 Years Presently Working As Shiksha Karmi Grade-1, At Govt. Boys Hr. Secondary School, Sarsiva, District Baloda Bazar Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
... Applicant versus 1 - Pradip Kumar S/o Late Manharan Lal Soni Aged About 34 Years R/o Tenda Nawapara Thana Gharghoda, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Damrudhar Swarnkar S/o B. L. Swarwlar Aged About 47 Years R/o Basant Vihar, Jaspur Nagar, Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Miss Maduri Swarnkar W/o Damrudhar Swarnkar Aged About 39 Years R/o Basant Vihar, Jaspur Nagar, District Jashpur Nagar, Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ms. Rohini Soni W/o Late Manharanlal Soni Aged About 60 Years R/o Tenda Nawapara Thana Gharghoda, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - Durgesh Soni S/o Late Manharanlal Soni Aged About 38 Years R/o Tenda Nawapara Thana Gharghoda, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.10.17 16:53:56 +0530
2 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh By The District Collector, Raigarh Taluka Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : None For State/Respondent No.6 : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Puriya, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No.1 to 5 : Ms. Vijay Laxmi Soni, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 17/10/2025
1. No one appears, nor any representation was made on behalf of the applicant, even when the case is called out in the second round of hearing.
2. In view of above circumstance, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss this Criminal Revision for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge
Ravi Mandavi