[2025:RJ-JP:41847] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12195/2025 Shambhulal S/o Panchulal, R/o Raghunathpura, Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi (Raj.). (Presently Accused Petitioner Is In District Jail, Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12765/2025 Ramesh S/o Nandkishore, R/o Raghunathpura, Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi (Raj.). (Presently Accused Petitioner Is In District Jail, Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Vijaywargia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-Addl.GA cum PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 14/10/2025 1. Both bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS have been filed by the petitioners in connection with FIR No.175/2025, registered at Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi wherein they have been charged for offences punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS and Section 4/21 of the M.M.D.R. Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the alleged offences under Section 4/21 of M.M.D.R. Act and Section 303 (2) of [2025:RJ-JP:41847] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12195/2025] the BNS are triable by the Magistrate. Counsel submits that the allegation against the petitioner-Shambhulal is that he was the registered owner of the vehicle and the petitioner- Ramesh was carrying Bajri in the vehicle. Counsel submits that the Ramesh is having no criminal antecedents and one criminal case under Section 13 of RPGO Act was lodged against the petitioner-Shambhulal which has been disposed of in the year 2009 itself thereafter no criminal case has been registered against the petitioner-Shambhu Lal . Counsel submits that the petitioners are in custody since the date of their arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioners. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that all the offences are triable by the Magistrate and also looking to the fact that the petitioners are in custody and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioners under Section 483 BNSS. 5. Accordingly, both bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners Shambhulal S/o Panchulal and Ramesh S/o Nandkishore arrested in connection with the aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear [2025:RJ-JP:41847] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12195/2025] before that Court on all dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/127, 129