VIJENDRA MEENA S/O BANWARI LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/8643/2024 · 2025-01-13
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40602 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40602 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.8643/2024 Vijendra Meena S/o Banwari Lal Meena, R/o 35, Lokmanya Nagar, Goner Mod, Tonk Road, Police Station Shivdaspura, Jaipur Presently 12 Miles Chokha Dhaba, Opp. Chokhi Dhani, Tonk Road, Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan.
3. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Govt. Hostel, M.i. Road, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (East).
5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Pratap Nagar (Jaipur City (East), District Jaipur City (East). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.1978/2024 Vijendra Meena S/o Banwari Lal Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 35, Lokmanya Nagar, Badi Ka Bas, Jaipur, Presently 12 Meel Chokha Dhaba, Opp. Chokhi Dhani, Tonk Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur.
3. The Commissioner Of Police Police Commissionerate, Govt. Hostel, M.i. Road, Jaipur.
4. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (East).
5. The Sho, Police Station Pratap Nagar, District Jaiupr City (East).
6. Vikram Meena S/o Rajaram Meena, R/o Khirni, Bonli, Sawai Madhopur, Presently Residing At 54, Khushi Sansar, Badi Ka Bas, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
7. Golu S/o Unlknown, R/o Jaipur.
8. Rohit @ Rohitash S/o Unknown, R/o Jaipur
(2 of 3) [CRLMP-8643/2024] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 13/01/2025
1. Both these petitions have been submitted by the petitioners; one for issuing directions to the Investigating Agency for conducting fair and impartial investigation in the FIR No.828/2024 registered with the Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur City (East) & the another petition has been submitted seeking protection of the petitioner at the hands of the respondents Nos.6, 7 & 8.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cross cases have been lodged between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has levelled allegations of offence punishable under the SC/ST Act and the contents of the FIR indicate that offence of the above Act is made out but the Police has not registered the case for the above offence against the accused persons.
3. This Court has called for the status report of the investigation conducted so far. Pursuant to which, the SHO, Police Station, Pratap Nagar Jaipur City (East) has furnished the status report of investigation, which indicates that the offence punishable under B.N.S. were found to be proved against the accused persons and the police is in process of filling of the charge-sheet against them.
(3 of 3) [CRLMP-8643/2024]
4. At this stage, this court cannot issue any direction to the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter in a particular way. In case, the petitioner feels that offence under the provisions of SC/ST Act is made out against the accused persons and he is getting any threats from the accused-persons, he shall file a detailed comprehensive representation to the Superintendent of Police who will look into the matter and would pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, these petitions stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/175-176