Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 406 (UTT)

SUKHVINDER ALIAS PANDIT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1362/2025 · 2026-05-05

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA1 No. 1362 of 2025 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. This first bail application has been moved by the applicant – Sukhvinder @ Pandit, seeking regular bail in Case Crime/ F.I.R. No. 704 of 2024, under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406 of IPC, registered at Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. 4. In this case, an FIR was lodged by one Baleshwar, in which, it was alleged that he has purchased a land in which Mukesh and Rahul were the middlemen and when they applied for mutation, it was revealed that the sale deed of the land, which they have purchased, was executed on the basis of the forged Aadhar card of the original landholders. 5. It is the case of the applicant that he is not named in the FIR and during investigation, on the statement of the co- accused Rahul and Mukesh, the applicant was made the accused. As per the chargesheet, some money was transferred by way of cash and some money was transferred in the account of Rahul and no money was transferred in the account of the present applicant; that both the co-accused have been granted bail by the Trial Court; that applicant have only been made the accused on the basis of the statements of the co-accused Mukesh and Rahul. 6. Learned State Counsel, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 8. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties and also considering the fact that no money was found to be transferred in the account of the present applicant, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. 9. The bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant be released on bail, on executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of Court concerned. ( Alok Mah r a J.) 05.05.2026 Ujjwal