Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40595 (KAR)

MR. RAAJEEV ANAND BHATNAGAR v. MIQ LOGISTICS LLC

COMAP/470/2022 · 2025-11-21

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48187-DB COMAP No. 470 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.470 OF 2022 BETWEEN: MR. RAAJEEV ANAND BHATNAGAR AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/O 16-901-02 INDRA DARSHAN, NEW LINK ROAD LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX ANDHERI (WEST) MUMBAI - 400 053 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ROSHAN GEORGE JACOB, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MIQ LOGISTICS LLC A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE 1 1501 OUTLOOK STREET SUIT 500, OVERLAND PARK KANSAS - 66213. Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48187-DB COMAP No. 470 of 2022 2. UNIVERSAL FRIEGHT MANAGEMENT INDIA PVT. LTD., A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 14, FOURTH FLOOR KRISHNA COMPLEX, SBI ROAD BENGALURU - 560001 THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR …RESPONDENTS THIS COMAP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 13 (1A) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015, PRAYING TO 1) ALLOW THE PRESENT COMMERCIAL APPEAL, 2) CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN COM.O.S.NO.4563/2016 FILED BEFORE THE LXXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48187-DB COMAP No. 470 of 2022 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal and has filed a memo to that effect. The memo reads as under; "The counsel for the Appellant humbly submits that as per the Appellants instructions, the appellant humbly requests this Hon'ble Court to allow the Appellant to withdraw the instant Commercial Appeal with liberty to refile the same and claim the refund of Court fee in the interest of justice and equity." 2. In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Registry is directed to refund the eligible court fee after following proper procedure. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE RAK,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22