Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40593 (PAT)

Binda Prasad and Ors v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/12771/2016 · 2025-07-22

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12771 of 2016 ====================================================== 1. Binda Prasad S/o Late Mahadeo Sah. 2. Purshottam Kumar S/o Binda Prasad. 3. Poonam Kumar W/o Purshottam Kumar 4. Mostt Chanda W/o Late Sanjay Praasad, S/o Binda Prasad, All R/o- Baragaon Bazar, P.O. P.S.- Prakhardh Bajpatti, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Land Acquisition, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Collector, Sitamarhi. 5. The Land Acquisition Officer, Sitamarhi. 6. The Superintendent Engineer, Rural Work Department, Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna. 7. Executive Engineer, Rural Work Department, Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana Office at Pupri, distri ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Mallika Mazumdar, Advocate Mr. Rajnish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Archana Meenakshee, GP-6 Mr. Rana Veer Prawar, AC to GP-6 Mr. Rohit Singh, AC to GP-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 22-07-2025 Heard Mr. Rajnish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Archana Meenakshee, learned GP-6. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for a direction upon respondent authorities for payment for the land of the Patna High Court CWJC No.12771 of 2016(2) dt.22-07-2025 2/2 farmers taken by Rural Works Department for construction of road under Pradhan Mantri Gramin Sadak Yojna. 3. On the instruction of Ms. Mallika Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioners who is appearing before this Court submit that now that land has been released, the case has become infructuous. 4. In that background, the writ petition is disposed of. 5. Pending Interlocutory Application(s), if any also stand(s) disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U