SMT. ARUNA SHARMA W/O SURENDER KUMAR SHARMA v. RAMKISHAN SHARMA S/O LATE SHRI SUDARSHAN LAL SHARMA
CW/1178/2025 · 2025-02-05
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4059 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4059 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:5045] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1178/2025
1. Smt. Aruna Sharma W/o Surender Kumar Sharma, R/o Plot No. 9-A, Fateh Colony, Satya Nagar, Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Shri Surender Kuamr Sharma S/o Late Shri Manoharlal, R/o Plot No. 9-A, Fateh Colony, Satya Nagar, Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Shri Jatin Sharma S/o Shri Surender Sharma, R/o Plot No. 9-A, Fateh Colony, Satya Nagar, Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus Ramkishan Sharma S/o Late Shri Sudarshan Lal Sharma, R/o Plot No. 9-A, Fateh Colony, Satya Nagar, Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shantanu Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. D.K. Dixit HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 05/02/2025
1. Instant writ petition has been filed by petitioners, impugning the final order dated 02.01.2025 passed by the appellate Authority i.e. the District Collector, Jaipur, affirming the order dated 06.07.2023 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Jaipur City (South), Jaipur, directing eviction of petitioners from House No. 9- A, Fateh Colony, Jhotwara, Jaipur, on the application filed by respondent under Section 4/ 5 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007.
[2025:RJ-JP:5045] (2 of 2) [CW-1178/2025]
2. Heard counsel for both parties and perused the impugned orders.
3. It has been informed that during course of this writ petition, the orders impugned have been executed and actual & physical possession of the house in question has been handed over by the petitioners to respondent, as much as petitioners have undertaken not to harass respondent in peaceful use and occupation of the house in question. In that view, nothing survives to be adjudicated on merits in the present writ petition. In such view, counsel for petitioners, having instructions of petitioners, submits that petitioners do not want to pursue the present writ petition.
4. Respondent has no objection.
5. With the aforesaid, the present writ petition is hereby dismissed.
6. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/42