Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
'‘APHC010027332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 54 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 21 of NIA Act against the dismissed Bail Order in CrI.M.P.No; 2288/2024 in SC.No: 15/2023 dated 13.12.2024 on the file of III Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum- Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vishakapatnam. Between: Sonu Kumar, S/o Om Prakash Sharma, Aged about 27 years. Employee, R/o Chatrapur Village, GarhUmarao P O., Sadabad P.S., Hakhras District, Uttar Pradesh. ...Accused/Appellant And
1. The Union Of India, represented by the Additional Solicitor General, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh.
2. The Special Public Prosecutor, National Investigation Agency, Hyderabad. ...Complainant/Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: SmNlVASULU P Counsel for the Respondents: i^Rl PASALA PONNA RAO, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following Judgment:
APHC010027332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3528] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 54/2025 Between:
1.SONU KUMAR, S/0 OM PRAKASH SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 27 CHATRAPUR VILLAGE, YEARS. EMPLOYEE, R/0 GARHUMARAO P.O., SADABAD P.S., HAKHRAS DISTRICT UTTAR PRADESH. ...APELLANT AND 1.THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI,ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY, HYDERABAD. ...RESPODENT(S); Counsel for the Appellant:
1.SRINIVASULU P Counsel for the Respondent(S):
IPasala Ponna Rao,DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
2 Crl.A.No.54 of 2025 ■ The Court made the following
JUDGMENT (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Suresh Reddy) Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned counsel for the appellant, who appeared through virtual mode, requested this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Appeal.
2. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the present Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
3. closed.
Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER \ To,
1. The III Additional District & Sessions Judge cum Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, yisakhapatnam.
2. One CC to Sri SrWvasulu P, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri Pasala Ponna Rao, Deputy Solicitor General Of India [OPUC]
4. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra PRadesh.
5. Two CD Copies vna
HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025
JUDGMENT CRLA No. 54/2025 €=» ^ 0 8 SEP 2025 Sectwp,^^' c»,* DISMISSING THE CRLA AS WITHDRAWN