DR,J WP.No.29719 of 2025 APHC010575412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 29719 OF 2025 Between: 1. MOHAMMAD AHMAD, S/o Mohammad Nazeer, Aged about 52 years, Occupation Cycle Repairing, R/o D.No.6-214, GBG Road, Chintalapudi Village and Mandal, Eluru District. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Represented by its Principal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Eluru District, At Eluru. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nuziveedu Revenue Division, Nuziveedu, Eluru District. 4. The Tahsildar, Chintalapudi Mandal, Chintalapudi, Eluru District. 5. Chintalapudi Nagara Panchayat, Represented by its Commissioner Chintalapudi Village and Mandal, Eluru District. 6. ChitIuri Anji Babu, S/o Anjiyya, Aged about 48 years, R/o D.No.4-14, GBG Road, Chintalapudi Village and Mandal Eluru District. 7. ChitIuri Rambabu, S/o Anjiyya, Aged about 45 years, R/o D.No.4-14, GBG Road, Chintalapudi Village and Mandal, Eluru District. DR,J WP.No.29719 of 2025 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an Order or a Direction or a Writ more in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the action of 4th Respondent herein in dispossessing the Petitioner herein from the assigned land under D Form patta issued on 15.10.1976 admeasuring Ac.0.05 cents covered under Sy.No.832/6 situated at Chintalapudi Village and Mandal, Eluru District without issuing prior notice or conducting enquiry as arbitrary, autocratic, illegal, ultra vires and against the principles of natural justice consequently direct the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner herein from the above mentioned land without due process of law in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S.ASTONISH LAWS Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents:Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities DR,J WP.No.29719 of 2025 The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition, under article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following prayer: “…to issue an Order or a Direction or a Writ more in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the action of 4th Respondent herein in dispossessing the Petitioner herein from the assigned land under D Form patta issued on 15.10.1976 admeasuring Ac.0.05 cents covered under Sy.No.832/6 situated at Chintalapudi Village and Mandal, Eluru District without issuing prior notice or conducting enquiry as arbitrary, autocratic, illegal, ultra vires and against the principles of natural justice consequently direct the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner herein from the above mentioned land without due process of law… “ 2. Considering the submissions, this Court passed the following interim order on 30.10.2025. “ Learned counsel for petitioner is permitted to takeout personal notice to respondent Nos.6 and 7 through registered post with acknowledgment due and file proof of service in the Registry. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent authorities have granted D-form patta on 14.10.1976. Since then, petitioner’s family has been in peaceful possession and enjoyment over the subject property. Now, the respondents are interfering with the petitioner’s property. Hence, the present writ petition is filed seeking a direction to respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.832/6 situated at Chintalapudi Village and Mandal, Eluru District, without following due process of law. …... Meanwhile, respondents are directed to maintain Status Quo existing as on today” 3. In compliance to the orders, the petitioner has taken out notices to respondent Nos.6 and 7 and filed proof of service. DR,J WP.No.29719 of 2025 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents. 5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader based on the written instructions furnished by the Tahsildar/ 4th respondent submits that the respondent authorities never interfered into the possession of the petitioner and they are not intending to dispossess the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of and if at all, the petitioner has any grievance with unofficial respondents, the petitioner may approach appropriate forum according to law. As a sequel, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________ JUSTICE D RAMESH Date: 27.11.2025 Dvs DR,J WP.No.29719 of 2025 163 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 29719 OF 2025 Date: 27.11.2025 Dvs