APHC010082892024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 4890/2024 Between: M/S. AL SAMI AGRO PRODUCTS PVT, LTD. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ABDUL SALAM, S/O ABDUL ISMAIL, 45-1-13/1, GOREKSHANAPETA, NEAR BSSB SCHOOL BAIPASS ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY,EAST GODAVARI, ANDHRAPRADESH-533101. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI. 2. THE PRESIDENT, LORRY OWNERS, ASSOCIATION, KATHIPUUDI, EASTGODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRAPRADESH-533444. 3. THE SECRETARY, LORRY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, KATHIPUUDI, EASTGODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRAPRADESH-533444. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANNAVARAM P,S, ANNAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. 5. CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PATHIPADU, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PEDDAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G N V PULLA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents No. 4 to 6 and initiating action against Respondents 2 and 3 is illegal, arbitrary and amounts to abdication of statutory duties cast up on them and also violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently 2 to direct the respondents 4 to 6 against the respondents 2 and 3 to safe guard to my business in the hands of R2 and R3.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that, since the relief claimed in the present petition is against the private individuals, the writ is not maintainable and the same may be disposed of. 3. Ms.Sangeetha, learned counsel representing Sri G.N.V.Pulla rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.4890 of 2024 Dt.20.11.2025 Dinesh