Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40577 (KAR)

REKHA BISWAS v. SIDDHARTH SALIAN

CMP/556/2024 · 2025-11-21

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48360 CMP No. 556 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 556 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. REKHA BISWAS D/O RAJKUMAR KHATRI AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS C 601 SHRIRAM LUXOR HENNUR BAGLUR MAIN ROAD BANGALORE 560077 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.KARAN JOSEPH., ADVOCATE) And: 1. SIDDHARTH SALIAN S/O NAVIN CHENAPPA SALIAN AGED ABOUT 40 R/AT AMBER KUTIR, 5TH FLOOR 166 SHIVAJI PARK DR. M B RAUT ROAD MUMBAI 400028. 2. MAXIMILIANO MODESTI S/O DELFINO MODESTI AGED ABOUT 48 HAVING OFFICE AT 2M ATELIERS AND DESIGN PVT. LTD. 62, FLOOR 3, EVERGREEN INDUSTRIAL ESTATE DR. E MOSES ROAD, SHAKTI MILL LANE JACO, B CIRCLE, MUMBAI CITY MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA, 400011. 3. STUDIO SILAI LLP HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT SY 33 MANASWI EDIFICE, KOTHANUR MAIN ROAD BEHIND AMMAS PASTRIES KOTHANUR, BANGALORE Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48360 CMP No. 556 of 2024 BANGALORE NORTH KARNATAKA, INDIA, 560077 REP. HEREIN BY ALL ITS DESIGNATED PARTNERS …RESPONDENTS THIS CIVIL MISC. PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO A. APPOINT A SOLE ARBITRATOR TO ADJUDICATE UPON THE DISPUTES RAISED BY THE PETITIONER THAT HAVE ARISEN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 AND 2 IN RESPECT OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT DATED 19 JULY 2022 PURSUANT TO CLAUSE 45 UNDER THE SAID AGREEMENT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following relief’s; A. Appoint a sole arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes raised by the petitioner that have arisen between the petitioner and the respondent no. 1 and 2 in respect of the limited liability partnership agreement dated 19 july 2022 pursuant to clause 45 under the said agreement. B. Grant costs of this petition to the Petitioner; and C. Grant such other relief’s as the Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48360 CMP No. 556 of 2024 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the above petition on the ground that the parties, by consent, have appointed an arbitrator. 3. Placing the submission of learned counsel and taking on record the memo of withdrawal, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Registry is directed to return the original and/or certified copies, if produced, to the respective parties who have produced it/them by following due procedure. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE LN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 93