Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40575 (CHH)

CHAITRAM KENWAT v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1930/2022 · 2025-08-19

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:42000-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1930 of 2022 Chaitram Kenwat S/o Late Basant Ram Kenwat Aged About 49 Years R/o Dhabapara Ward No. 3 Malhar, P.S. Masturi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Gandhinagar, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2 - Tiluram S/o Ransai, Aged About 61 Years R/o Jogibandh, Ambikapur, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent No.1/State : Mr.Saumya Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 20 .08 .2025 1. Case is called out. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the instant petition. However, Mr. Soumya Rai, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1/State. BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.08.20 17:10:28 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash the first information report, charge sheet and criminal proceeding pending before the court of learned Special Judge (Chhattisgarh Nikshepako Ke Hito ka Sanrakshan Adhiniyam), Ambikapur District Sarguja Sarguja Speciulcus in bearing Special Case No. 04/2021 in respect of case of the petitioner and the petitioner may be acquitted from the aforesaid offences which is registered against him, in the interest of justice.” 3. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition when the case is called out. 4. It transpires that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu