DEEPAK BAIRWA S/O BANSI LAL BAIRWA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/973/2025 · 2025-05-09
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4057 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4057 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:19638] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 973/2025 Deepak Bairwa S/o Bansi Lal Bairwa, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Kapoorwala, Tehsil Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Insitution, Jaipur.
3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Ms. Anjali Sharma Mr. Rahul Verma Mr. Prakhar Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 09/05/2025
1. Heard learned counsel for both parties and perused the record.
2. By means of instant writ petition, the petitioner claimed for grant of 25 bonus marks for the working experience gained during the Covid period and also prayed for grant of appointment on the post of Nursing Officer in the SC Male Category in pursuance of the Advertisement dated 05.05.2023.
3. Learned Additional Government Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that the petitioner has been given 15
[2025:RJ-JP:19638] (2 of 2) [CW-973/2025] bonus marks. It has also been submitted that as per the order dated 25.04.2023 issued by the Medical and Health Department, Government of Rajasthan, criteria for awarding bonus marks is as under:- lafonk@vko';d vLFkkbZ vk/kkj ij dk;Z vof/k Ckksul vad 1- nks o"kZ ls de 15 2- nks o"kZ ;k blls vf/kd fdUrq rhu o"kZ ls de 20 3- rhu o"kZ ;k blls vf/kd 30
4. Undisputedly, the petitioner has rendered services for a period of less than two years, hence, he has been awarded 15 bonus marks. The claim of the petitioner for 25 bonus marks is misplaced as it does not fall in the criteria of awarding bonus marks as prescribed under the order dated 25.04.2023.
5. Since, the petitioner has been awarded 15 bonus marks, but thereafter he secured less marks i.e. 62.130, than the cut off marks in the SC Male category i.e. 65.433. Thus, the prayer of the petitioner for granting appointment on the post of Nursing Officer is devoid of merits and same is hereby rejected.
6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed.
7. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /3