- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42779 WP No. 10546 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 10546 OF 2022 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SRI GANGAPARAMESHWARI MULTIPURPOSE FISHERMEN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, PARANGICHIKKNAPALYA, KASABA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY/ CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI SHIVANNA, S/O SIDDALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O PARANGICHIKKANAPALYA KASABA AND MADABAL HOBLI MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 572120 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.N. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA - 562 159 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION RAMANAGARA - 562 159 3. SHIVAGANGA BESTHARA MEENUGARARA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITA BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER PARANGICHIKKANAPALYA MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 120 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. CHANDINI .S., HCGP FOR R1 & 2 SRI. MANU SHANKAR .S.S., ADVOCATE FOR C/R3 (ABSENT)) Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42779 WP No. 10546 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 03.09.2021 PASSED BY R1 IN APPEAL AS PER ANNEXURE-K AND THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DTD 13.02.2020 ISSUED BY R2 IN FAVOUR OF R3 SOCIETY AS PER ANNEXURE-E AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. The order sheet dated 09.10.2025 reads as under: Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford final opportunity, list this matter finally on 28.10.2025. Inspite of that there is no representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BH: CT:VS: List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7