IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (125) CWP-9114-2025 Decided on :01.04.2025 Narender Kumar and another ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ……Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner (s). Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. AG, Haryana, Mr. Pradeep Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana & Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. ***** Deepak Sibal, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, she would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner, Rewari to take a decision on the representation dated 23.10.2024 (Annexure P-3) moved by the petitioners. 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Deputy Commissioner, Rewari to take a decision on the aforesaid representation moved by the petitioners, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, preferably within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.04.02 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh CWP-9114-2025 -2- 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (SUMEET GOEL) April 01, 2025 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.04.02 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh