APHC010383932022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 23543/2022 Between: 1. SMT.K.RAJESWARI, W/O N.NADHAMUNI AGE.51 YEARS, OCC. F.P. SHOP DEALER OF SHOP NO.1050019, GODUGUMANUPALLI VILLAGE PENUMURU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CHITTOOR DIST., AT CHITTOOR 3. THE COLLECTOR CS, CHITTOOR DIST., AT CHITTOOR. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR DIST., AT CHITTOOR. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, PENUMURU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring the order issued by the 2nd respondent vide Rc.CS1/145/2022 dt.27- 5- 2022 confirming the cancellation orders passed by the 3rd respondent vide Roc.C1/198/2021 dt.18-2-2022 and the 4th respondent vide 2 VS, J W.P.No.23543 of 2022 D.Dis.B1/1164/2021 dt.30-7-2021 in respect of FP Shop No. 1050019, Godugumanupalli Village, Penumuru Mandal, Chittoor Dist., without following the procedure as contemplated under AP State Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order,2018 as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside all the above orders and further direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as FP Shop dealer as usual and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Suspend the operation of the order issued by the 2nd respondent vide Rc.CS1/145/2022 dt.27-5-2022 confirming the cancellation orders passed by the 3rd respondent vide Roc.C1/198/2021 dt.18-2-2022 and the 4th respondent vide D.Dis.B1/1164/2021 dt.30-7-2021 in respect of FP Shop No. 1050019, Godugumanupalli Village, Penumuru Mandal, Chittoor Dist., by continuing the petitioner as FP Shop dealer, pending disposal of the writ petition. IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim orders dt.01-08-2022 in WP.No.23543/2022 and dismiss the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M M M SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: 3 VS, J W.P.No.23543 of 2022 ORDER:- The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to a writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring the order issued by the 2nd respondent vide Rc.CS1/145/2022 dt.27-5- 2022 confirming the cancellation orders passed by the 3rd respondent vide Roc.C1/198/2021 dt.18-2-2022 and the 4th respondent vide D.Dis.B1/1164/2021 dt.30-7-2021 in respect of FP Shop No. 1050019, Godugumanupalli Village, Penumuru Mandal, Chittoor Dist., without following the procedure as contemplated under AP State Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order,2018 as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside all the above orders and further direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as FP Shop dealer....” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdrawn the present writ petition with a liberty to prefer a second revision before the Government under Section 24(e) of the Andhra Pradesh State Targetted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2018, which reads as follows. “Any person aggrieved by the orders of the 1st Revisionary Authority may file Revision before the Government.” 4 VS, J W.P.No.23543 of 2022 3. At request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty as sought for. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 03.11.2025 KGR/CAB