MAHESH KUMAR SON OF NAHNURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14528/2025 · 2025-11-10
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40558 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40558 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44917] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14528/2025
1. Mahesh Kumar Son Of Nahnuram, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Pandavon Ki Dhani, Tan Kushalpura, Police Station Raisar, District Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)
2. Lalluram Son Of Nehnuram, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Pandavon Ki Dhani, Tan Kushalpura, Police Station Raisar, District Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Accused-Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Non-Applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Nav Ratan Singh For Non-Applicant(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 10/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 146/2025 registered at Police Station Raisar, District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 329(4), 324(4) and 74 of BNS,
2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that applicants and the complainant are neighbors, and in fit of rage, the fight occurred. It is submitted that there was a life threatening injury and there is recovery of wooden stick from Lalluram. It is also submitted that other than the head injury
[2025:RJ-JP:44917] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14528/2025] which is assigned to Lalluram, there is no injury, which is grievous and life threatening. It is lastly submitted that the applicants are sole bread earners for their family.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application.
4. Heard and considered.
5. Considering the facts of the case, that categorical allegations are leveled in the FIR, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant (Mahesh Kumar) on bail as no specific allegations are assigned to him and there is no recovery from him. Howsoever, the co-applicant’s (Lalluram) bail is rejected for the reason that categorical allegations of serious nature are leveled against him.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is partly-allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Mahesh Kumar Son Of Nahnuram shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
7. Bail application upto the extend of applicant-Lalluram is dismissed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/226