Somula Chinna Dastagiri Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/31491/2025 · 2025-11-13
D Ramesh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40558 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40558 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010607672025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31491/2025 Between:
1. SOMULA CHINNA DASTAGIRI REDDY, S/O S. HUSSAIN REDDY
AGE 58 YEARS,R/O.4/112,,PUCHHAKAYALAPALLE, NOSSAM, UYYALAWADA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY TO GOVT., REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JAMMALAMADUGU DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, , PEDDAMUDIUM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. MANDAL SURVEYOR, PEDDAMUDIUM MANDAL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KODATI RAMYA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.31491 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…..to issue a appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondent No.4 in trying to form a public road from the petitioner’s land admeasuring Ac.0.0817 cents in survey No.137/A-1C Ac. 0.065 cents in survey No.137/A-2C and Ac.0.293 cents in survey No. 136/A-3 and further extent of Ac.0.1283 cents in survey No 137/A-1B and Ac. 0.01050 cents in 137/A- 2B and Ac.0.0970 cents in survey No.136/A-2 of Nagireddypalle Revenue Village, Peddamudiam Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, without invoking the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as illegal, irregular, unjust, high handed besides arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.4 not to form any road from the land of the petitioner admeasuring Ac.0.0817 cents in survey No.137/A-1C Ac. 0.065 cents in survey No 137/A-2C and Ac.0.293 cents in survey No 136/A-3 and further extent of Ac.0.1283 cents in
4
survey No 137/A-1B and Ac. 0.01050 cents in 137/A- 2B and Ac.0.0970 cents in survey No.136/A-2 of Nagireddypalle Revenue Village, Peddamudiam Mandal, YSR Kadapa District ….”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader has placed reliance on the written instructions received from the Tahsildar, Peddamudium.
According to the instructions, though the respondents have not made any specific averment about the issuance of notification, they have made averments that the subject properties were required for expanding the National Highways
NH-167K from Kurnool/Kadapa border to Jammalamadugu and the respondents have undertaken procedure under Section 28 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and already enquiry is being conducted. 4. In the said circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from
5
the subject properties without following due process of law by paying compensation. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 14.11.2025 Ivd
6
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.31491 of 2025
Dated: 14.11.2025
Ivd