Urmila Ingale 908-wp-7754-25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7754 OF 2025 Snehalata Diliprao Patil .. Petitioner VS. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. S.B. Patil, for the Petitioner. Ms. M.S. Bane, AGP for Respondent-State. CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, AND N.R.BORKAR, JJ. DATE : JUNE 17, 2025 P.C.: 1. We are not inclined to entertain the present petition as the remedy of the petitioner is to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (for short “ the Tribunal”). However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only relief he is pressing is that the competent authority to decide the representation dated 04/06/2025 which is at page 26 of the writ petition. Even this relief can be the subject matter before the Tribunal. In any case, representation has been made to the 1/2 URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2025.06.17 18:34:55 +0530 Urmila Ingale 908-wp-7754-25.doc Additional Chief Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralaya. There is no reason why the representation made by the petitioner who is the Deputy Director with the Forest Department will not be looked into and taken to its logical conclusion at the earliest. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, undoubtedly, will look into the representation and take the same to the logical conclusion at the earliest. 3. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. ( N.R.BORKAR, J.) (M.S.KARNIK, J.) 2/2