APHC010385892023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19862/2023 Between: 1. SARANAM MAHA LAKSHMI, W/O SARANAM SRINIVASA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO.7, ABHIGNYA CLASSIC, CHAITANYAPURI 1ST LANE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SARANAM SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O JANARDHAN RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO.7, ABHIGNYA CLASSIC, CHAITANYAPURI 15T LANE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, LALAPET POLICE STATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. GOKAVARAPU PRATAP KUMAR, S/O RAMANJANEYULU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O HAT NO. 501, GARDINIA APARTMENT, 3RD LANE, MUTYALAREDDY NAGAR, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. GOKAVARAPU RAMANJANEYULU, S/O RAMA MOHANA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO. 501, GARDINIA APARTMENT, 3RD LANE, MUTYALAREDDY NAGAR, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2ndRespondent in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 19.07.2023 in view of the complaints given to the 3rd respondent and also calling the petitioners to the police station as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2ndRespondent to take action by considering the petitioners representation dated 19.07.2023 and also not to harass the petitioners by calling them to the police station and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 2ndRespondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioners dated 19.07.2023 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PILLI SUNDEEP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. C.PANINI SOMAYAJI THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19862/2023 The Court made the following Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 19.07.2023 in view of the complaints given to the 3rd respondent and also calling the petitioners to the police station as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to take action by considering the petitioners representation dated 19.07.2023 and also not to harass the petitioners by calling them to the police station and pass such other order or orders…” 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:04.12.2025 Ksj