KAPIL CHOUDHARY v. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION
WPS/10360/2025 · 2025-09-08
Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40552 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40552 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:45930
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10360 of 2025
1. Kapil Choudhary S/o Shri Ramsevak Ram Aged About 64 Years R/o Flat No. 201, Kutumb Apartment, Balwant Nagar, District Gwalior (M.P.)
... Petitioner versus
1. Employees Provident Fund Organization Through Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), D-Block, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Complex, Pandri, Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Employees Provident Fund Organization Through Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Exempted Pension-I, D K Block, Sector Ii, Salt Lake City, Kolkata (W.B.)
3. Central Board Of Trustees Through Chairman, D-Block, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Complex, Pandri, Raipur Chhattisgarh
4. Indian Oil Corporation Limited Through General Manager, Raipur Divisional Office, Indian Oil Bhawan, (Vip Road), Telibandha, Raipur Chhattisgarh
5. Indian Oil Corporation Limited Northern Region, Through General Manager, Indian Oil Bhawan, 1, Shri Aurobindo Marg, Yusuf Sarai, New Delhi
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Santoshi Yadav, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 3 : Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate For Respondents No. 4 and 5 : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocates MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.09.10 10:56:51 +0530
2 Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board 09.09.2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitoner who stood retired on 31.07.2021 from the post of Assistant Manager (Terminal) at Operations Mugalsarai Terminal of Indian Oil Corporation Limited, has moved an application before EPFO, Regional Office for grant of pensionary benefits, but the petitioner has not been given pensionary benefits under the EPF Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that for generating UA N certain documents like Aadhar Card details, Bank account and other relevant documents are required under the Scheme which should be provided by the respondent No. 4.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 would submit that they have already submitted the requisite documents to the respondents authorities.
4. In the eventuality of receiving the aforesaid documents, the respondent authorities shall generate UAN of the petitioner, therefore, the pensionary benefits shall be granted to the petitioner within an outer limit of three months from the date of copy of this
order.
5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish