HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 454 of 2025 Abhishek Tyagi ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Lalit Miglani, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No. 53 of 2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, Police Station Clementown, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused. 3. According to the FIR, the informant was shown a property; money was taken; sale deed was not executed. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the person, in whose account money was deposited, has already been granted bail; in the FIR, there is no role assigned to the applicant; merely his name has been written; co-accused Vijay Saraswat, Smt. Fatima, Sameer Kamiyab and others have already been granted either bail or 2 anticipatory bail; as per prosecution case, the money was deposited in the account of Sameer Kamyab, who has already been granted bail. 5. Learned State Counsel admits that co-accused, Sameer Kamyab, in whose account the money was deposited, has been granted bail. She would submit that from the account of co-accused Sameer Kamyab, money was transmitted in the account of the applicant. 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 7. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 09.06.2025 Ravi Bisht