IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10428 of 2016 ====================================================== Kailash Devi D/o Late Shiv Ratan Lal Mehta and Late Tatar Devi, W/o Shri Laxman Prasad Mehta, Resident of Mohalla - Jyotipuram Colony, Maurya path, P.O. - Bihar Veterinary College Campus, P.S. - Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Union Of India 2. The Under Secretary Policy Ministry of Home Affairs, Freedom Fighter Division, 2nd Floor, NDCC- 3. The Additional Secretary, Union of India Home Ministry , Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 4. The Joint Secretary, Union of India Home Ministry , Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 5. The Under Secretary, Union of India Home Ministry , Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 6. The State of Bihar through the Home Spl. Department, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 7. The Principal Secretary, Home Spl. Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 8. The Deputy Secretary to the Govt., Home SPl. Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 9. The District Magistrate, Patna 10. The Treasury Officer, Patna 11. The Senior Treasury officer, office of Treasury Danapur 12. The Sub Treasury officer, office of Treasury Danapur 13. The Accountant General of Bihar, Patna Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna 14. The Accountant General, Ranchi, Jharkhand 15. Senior Accounts officer, office of the Accountant General A and E , Jharkhand, Ranchi 16. Accounts officer, office of the Accountant General A and E , Jharkhand, Ranchi ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, AC to GP22 For the U.O.I. : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 6 01-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Patna High Court CWJC No.10428 of 2016(6) dt.01-08-2025 2/2 counsel for the Union of India and learned counsel for the respondent-State. 2. From a bare perusal of the prayer made in the writ application, it is apparent that the cause of action for pursuing this relief arose to the petitioner in the year 1978 but he has filed this writ application in the year 2016 i.e. almost after thirty- eight years. 3. This writ application is dismissed solely on account of having been filed belatedly after thirty-eight years. kiran/- (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U